Kulturskolan
100% Free Valid Dumps Questions Download Killexams pass4sure

Kulturskolan P2050-004 exam dumps | killexams.com P2050-004 dumps, questions and answers | Kulturskolan

Pass4sure P2050-004 dumps | Killexams.com P2050-004 existent questions | http://ajo.se/


Killexams.com P2050-004 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



P2050-004 exam Dumps Source : IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1

Test Code : P2050-004
Test appellation : IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1
Vendor appellation : IBM
dumps questions : 30 existent Questions

Save your time and money, read these P2050-004 dumps questions and win the exam.
Killexams.com P2050-004 braindump works. every bit of questions are proper and the solutions are correct. its miles well worth the cash. I exceeded my P2050-004 exam remaining week.


Get high scores in diminutive time for coaching.
Killexams.com P2050-004 braindump works. every bit of questions are unquestionable and the answers are correct. It is worth the money. I passed my P2050-004 exam terminal week.


Got no problem! 3 days preparation of P2050-004 dumps is required.
in case you want to exchange your destiny and ensure that happiness is your destiny, you want to travail hard. operatingtough on my own isnt enough to fetch to future, you want a few route in order to lead you toward the path. It wasdestiny that i organize this killexams.com every bit of through my exams because it lead me towards my destiny. My portion changed into getting accurate grades and this killexams.com and its teachers made it feasible my coaching they so well that I couldnt in every bit of likelihood fail by way of giving me the pith for my P2050-004 exam.


what's simplest way to set aside together and pass P2050-004 exam?
every time I want to pass my certification win a scrutinize at to maintain my task, I immediately vanish to killexams.com and search the specified certification win a scrutinize at, purchase and prepare the check. It clearly is worth admiring because, I constantly skip the check with exact scores.


it's miles incredible model to set aside together P2050-004 examination with dumps.
killexams.com Dumps site helped me fetch access to various exam training material for P2050-004 exam. I was confused that which one I ought to pick, however your specimens helped me pick the best one. I purchased killexams.com Dumps course, which incredibly helped me survey every bit of the fundamental ideas. I solved every bit of questions in due time. I am blissful to own killexams.com as my tutor. Much appreciated


I necessity dumps of P2050-004 exam.
I organized P2050-004 with the embolden of killexams.com and observed that they own got quite suitable stuff. i can pass for otherIBM checks as nicely.


P2050-004 actual test questions and solutions!
I exceeded the P2050-004 exam today and scored one hundred%! never thought I should execute it, however killexams.com grew to become out to exist a gem in examination training. I had a terrific feeling approximately it because it appeared to cover every bit of topics, and there own been masses of questions provided. yet, I didnt assume to survey every bit of of the identical questions in the actual exam. Very best marvel, and i quite imply using Killexams.


Really worthy experience!
I even own become a P2050-004 certified final week. This profession direction may exist very thrilling, so in case you are nonethelessconsidering it, ensure you fetch questions solutions to set aside together the P2050-004 examination. This is a commodious time saver as you fetch precisely what you necessity to recognise for the P2050-004 exam. This is why I selected it, and that i never appeared lower back.


Do not disburse commodious amount on P2050-004 guides, fetch this question bank.
I though that if I could pellucid their P2050-004 test and yes that is when I came to know with my dilapidated best friend that killexams.com is the one that would exist the boon for me as it got me my intelligence finally back which I had lost for a while and I wish that this would never fetch over for me getting my P2050-004 test cleared after all.


worried for P2050-004 exam? fetch this P2050-004 query bank.
My brother saden me telling me that I wasnt going to undergo the P2050-004 examination. I exist awake after I appearance out of doors the window, such a lot of one of a kindhearted human beings want to exist seen and heard from and that they sincerely want the eye human beings but im able to let you know that they students can fetch this interest whilst they pass their P2050-004 check and i will let you know how I cleared my P2050-004 test it become handiest when I own been given my own a scrutinize at questions from killexams.Com which gave me the wish in my eyes together every bit of the time.


IBM IBM Commerce Solutions Order

Did IBM overhype Watson fitness's AI promise? | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

5 vigour person counsel for Microsoft OneNote

IBM’s Cognitive solutions sales Slumped. What happened? | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

A key fragment of exotic enterprise Machines' (NYSE: IBM) turnaround effort is cognitive computing, which encompasses simulated intelligence (AI) together with related applied sciences. Watson, IBM's cognitive computing device than debuted by means of profitable a video game of Jeopardy! in 2011, has been utilized to fields together with healthcare, financial capabilities, and even fantasy football.

Cognitive computing is a boom enterprise for IBM, however you wouldn't are awake of it looking on the enterprise's third-quarter effects. The cognitive solutions segment suffered a 5% earnings decline, even after adjusting for a currency-connected headwind. That feels dote destitute information for an organization having a stake its future on AI.

The cognitive options section should basically exist known as the "cognitive options plus a bunch of other unrelated stuff" phase. It comprises Watson and other corporations with multiply skills, however additionally stuff dote legacy transaction-processing software. it's kindhearted of a seize bag of IBM organizations that don't fairly appropriate into its other segments.

That makes it tangled to inform how neatly IBM's multiply organizations are definitely doing, and it makes that 5% revenue decline a worthy deal less significant.

The IBM Watson logo.© IBM The IBM Watson emblem.

CFO James Kavanaugh went into some detail every bit of through the profits appellation related to the performance of the cognitive options company. The segment is damaged into two accessories: options application and transaction processing application.

options utility includes software aimed at strategic verticals (Kavanaugh singled out the healthcare trade). It likewise contains some analytics and security offerings, AI dote Watson, and blockchain. On desirable of every bit of that, "horizontal domains" dote collaboration and commerce are likewise blanketed.

Transaction processing application contains "utility that runs mission-essential workloads leveraging their hardware platform," based on Kavanaugh. here is mainly on-premises application used by means of industries dote banking, airlines, and retail.

Transaction processing utility accounted for a minority of cognitive options earnings in the third quarter, but salary from that category declined by using eight% year over year. Kavanaugh pointed out that, while lots of the revenue for transaction processing software is annuity-primarily based, the timing of commodious offers can own an sequel on revenue. Kavanaugh expects a revert to increase, in response to a robust pipeline of offers.

The options software constituent of the angle suffered a three% earnings decline, pushed by some areas where IBM is struggling. Secular shifts in the collaboration, commerce, and talent management markets are inflicting issues for the enterprise, and it exist been adding AI and modernizing its offerings to fight those alterations. The shift to utility as a provider is additionally inserting drive on sales, with profits being realized over time rather than up front.

The elements of this angle with lengthy-term multiply odds are the constituents which are turning out to be. Watson fitness, the company's effort to apply AI to the healthcare trade, loved extensive-based mostly growth every bit of over the third quarter. protection grew because of the enterprise's colossal portfolio of products. And the company made some commodious moves within the blockchain market.

IBM introduced TradeLens, a blockchain-based platform for the international shipping business, in August. The answer, jointly developed with Maersk, had 94 contributors on board at the time of the announcement. IBM food own confidence, a brand unusual blockchain-based platform that makes it feasible for meals to exist traced from farm to save, counts Walmart and French grocery store chain Carrefour as individuals. IBM's blockchain efforts are nonetheless of their infancy, but each of these systems own the scholarship to develop into meaningful groups for the business.

With the cognitive options angle being dragged down by using legacy companies, the headline efficiency would not mirror the efficiency of IBM's more promising groups.

backed: 10 stocks they dote more suitable than IBM

When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner own a stock tip, it will pay to hear. in any case, the e-newsletter they own flee for over a decade, Motley idiot stock advisor , has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom simply revealed what they believe are the 10 finest shares for buyers to buy presently... and IBM wasn't one among them! that's revise -- they feel these 10 stocks are even enhanced buys.

click on birthright here to study these picks!

*inventory advisor returns as of August 6, 2018

Timothy eco-friendly owns shares of IBM. The Motley idiot has no position in any of the shares outlined. The Motley fool has a disclosure policy.


Cloud Computing: IBM Acquires Sterling Commerce | killexams.com existent Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No result found, are attempting unusual key phrase!... solutions. "In aggregate with IBM's existing offerings, Sterling Commerce, Coremetrics and Unica are increasing IBM's capability to champion businesses automate, manage and accelerate core business proce...


Killexams.com P2050-004 Dumps and existent Questions

100% existent Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



P2050-004 exam Dumps Source : IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1

Test Code : P2050-004
Test appellation : IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1
Vendor appellation : IBM
dumps questions : 30 existent Questions

Save your time and money, read these P2050-004 dumps questions and win the exam.
Killexams.com P2050-004 braindump works. every bit of questions are proper and the solutions are correct. its miles well worth the cash. I exceeded my P2050-004 exam remaining week.


Get high scores in diminutive time for coaching.
Killexams.com P2050-004 braindump works. every bit of questions are unquestionable and the answers are correct. It is worth the money. I passed my P2050-004 exam terminal week.


Got no problem! 3 days preparation of P2050-004 dumps is required.
in case you want to exchange your destiny and ensure that happiness is your destiny, you want to travail hard. operatingtough on my own isnt enough to fetch to future, you want a few route in order to lead you toward the path. It wasdestiny that i organize this killexams.com every bit of through my exams because it lead me towards my destiny. My portion changed into getting accurate grades and this killexams.com and its teachers made it feasible my coaching they so well that I couldnt in every bit of likelihood fail by way of giving me the pith for my P2050-004 exam.


what's simplest way to set aside together and pass P2050-004 exam?
every time I want to pass my certification win a scrutinize at to maintain my task, I immediately vanish to killexams.com and search the specified certification win a scrutinize at, purchase and prepare the check. It clearly is worth admiring because, I constantly skip the check with exact scores.


it's miles incredible model to set aside together P2050-004 examination with dumps.
killexams.com Dumps site helped me fetch access to various exam training material for P2050-004 exam. I was confused that which one I ought to pick, however your specimens helped me pick the best one. I purchased killexams.com Dumps course, which incredibly helped me survey every bit of the fundamental ideas. I solved every bit of questions in due time. I am blissful to own killexams.com as my tutor. Much appreciated


I necessity dumps of P2050-004 exam.
I organized P2050-004 with the embolden of killexams.com and observed that they own got quite suitable stuff. i can pass for otherIBM checks as nicely.


P2050-004 actual test questions and solutions!
I exceeded the P2050-004 exam today and scored one hundred%! never thought I should execute it, however killexams.com grew to become out to exist a gem in examination training. I had a terrific feeling approximately it because it appeared to cover every bit of topics, and there own been masses of questions provided. yet, I didnt assume to survey every bit of of the identical questions in the actual exam. Very best marvel, and i quite imply using Killexams.


Really worthy experience!
I even own become a P2050-004 certified final week. This profession direction may exist very thrilling, so in case you are nonethelessconsidering it, ensure you fetch questions solutions to set aside together the P2050-004 examination. This is a commodious time saver as you fetch precisely what you necessity to recognise for the P2050-004 exam. This is why I selected it, and that i never appeared lower back.


Do not disburse commodious amount on P2050-004 guides, fetch this question bank.
I though that if I could pellucid their P2050-004 test and yes that is when I came to know with my dilapidated best friend that killexams.com is the one that would exist the boon for me as it got me my intelligence finally back which I had lost for a while and I wish that this would never fetch over for me getting my P2050-004 test cleared after all.


worried for P2050-004 exam? fetch this P2050-004 query bank.
My brother saden me telling me that I wasnt going to undergo the P2050-004 examination. I exist awake after I appearance out of doors the window, such a lot of one of a kindhearted human beings want to exist seen and heard from and that they sincerely want the eye human beings but im able to let you know that they students can fetch this interest whilst they pass their P2050-004 check and i will let you know how I cleared my P2050-004 test it become handiest when I own been given my own a scrutinize at questions from killexams.Com which gave me the wish in my eyes together every bit of the time.


While it is very arduous job to select accountable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people fetch ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com fabricate it certain to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client assurance is distinguished to us. Specially they win pervade of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you survey any untrue report posted by their competitors with the appellation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something dote this, just preserve in intellect that there are always debauch people damaging reputation of capable services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams exercise questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.


Vk Profile
Vk Details
Tumbler
linkedin
Killexams Reddit
digg
Slashdot
Facebook
Twitter
dzone
Instagram
Google Album
Google About me
Youtube



000-M31 exercise questions | 640-803 exam questions | 000-959 exercise test | PW0-205 existent questions | JN0-730 study guide | EE0-502 mock exam | 00M-512 VCE | TB0-110 brain dumps | 00M-663 exercise Test | HP0-J36 dumps questions | 1Z0-481 existent questions | 1Z0-961 sample test | 000-057 test questions | 1D0-532 exercise test | 9A0-079 exam prep | 000-M32 test prep | 190-825 braindumps | C2010-530 exercise questions | 310-400 cram | JK0-U31 pdf download |


P2050-004 exam questions | P2050-004 free pdf | P2050-004 pdf download | P2050-004 test questions | P2050-004 real questions | P2050-004 practice questions

Exactly identical P2050-004 questions as in existent test, WTF!
We own Tested and Approved P2050-004 Exams. killexams.com gives the most particular and latest IT exam materials which about accommodate every bit of exam themes. With the database of their P2050-004 exam materials, you don't necessity to misuse your chance on examining tedious reference books and unquestionably necessity to consume through 10-20 hours to expert their P2050-004 existent questions and answers.

Are you looking for IBM P2050-004 Dumps of existent questions for the IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1 Exam prep? They provide most updated and character P2050-004 Dumps. Detail is at http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/P2050-004. They own compiled a database of P2050-004 Dumps from actual exams in order to let you prepare and pass P2050-004 exam on the first attempt. Just memorize their dumps questions and relax. You will pass the exam. killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every bit of exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every bit of Orders

The only way to fetch success in the IBM P2050-004 exam is that you should obtain accountable preparatory materials. They guarantee that killexams.com is the most direct pathway towards Implementing IBM IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1 certificate. You will exist victorious with replete confidence. You can view free questions at killexams.com before you buy the P2050-004 exam products. Their simulated tests are in multiple-choice the identical as the existent exam pattern. The questions and answers created by the certified professionals. They provide you with the experience of taking the existent test. 100% guarantee to pass the P2050-004 actual test.

killexams.com IBM Certification study guides are setup by IT professionals. Lots of students own been complaining that there are too many questions in so many exercise exams and study guides, and they are just tired to afford any more. Seeing killexams.com experts travail out this comprehensive version while soundless guarantee that every bit of the scholarship is covered after profound research and analysis. Everything is to fabricate convenience for candidates on their road to certification.

We own Tested and Approved P2050-004 Exams. killexams.com provides the most accurate and latest IT exam materials which almost accommodate every bit of scholarship points. With the aid of their P2050-004 study materials, you dont necessity to dissipate your time on reading bulk of reference books and just necessity to disburse 10-20 hours to master their P2050-004 existent questions and answers. And they provide you with PDF Version & Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the candidates simulate the IBM P2050-004 exam in a existent environment.

We provide free update. Within validity period, if P2050-004 exam materials that you own purchased updated, they will inform you by email to download latest version of dumps questions. If you dont pass your IBM IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1 exam, They will give you replete refund. You necessity to ship the scanned copy of your P2050-004 exam report card to us. After confirming, they will quickly give you replete REFUND.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every bit of exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every bit of Orders


If you prepare for the IBM P2050-004 exam using their testing engine. It is smooth to succeed for every bit of certifications in the first attempt. You dont own to deal with every bit of dumps or any free torrent / rapidshare every bit of stuff. They tender free demo of each IT Certification Dumps. You can check out the interface, question character and usability of their exercise exams before you conclude to buy.

P2050-004 Practice Test | P2050-004 examcollection | P2050-004 VCE | P2050-004 study guide | P2050-004 practice exam | P2050-004 cram


Killexams HH0-200 VCE | Killexams 000-884 braindumps | Killexams HH0-230 bootcamp | Killexams 190-621 questions and answers | Killexams EX200 exercise questions | Killexams IIAP-CAP mock exam | Killexams 000-M17 braindumps | Killexams M8010-242 braindumps | Killexams 77-601 exam prep | Killexams NS0-530 brain dumps | Killexams C2010-501 dump | Killexams 000-782 exercise test | Killexams 920-458 test prep | Killexams 050-694 dumps questions | Killexams 9L0-063 study guide | Killexams P9510-020 existent questions | Killexams HP2-K03 questions and answers | Killexams 190-522 brain dumps | Killexams LOT-980 sample test | Killexams IIA-CIA-Part1 test prep |


Exam Simulator : Pass4sure P2050-004 VCE Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams HP0-J17 dumps questions | Killexams 9A0-056 free pdf download | Killexams HP0-052 exam prep | Killexams 132-S-911.2 mock exam | Killexams 201 cram | Killexams M2150-709 test prep | Killexams 9L0-012 exam prep | Killexams 000-M99 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-042 braindumps | Killexams ST0-91X existent questions | Killexams HP5-H05D test prep | Killexams CPEA test prep | Killexams 642-995 brain dumps | Killexams E20-535 exercise test | Killexams 00M-622 sample test | Killexams 000-139 existent questions | Killexams HP2-K33 braindumps | Killexams 1Y0-A01 questions answers | Killexams 646-985 questions and answers | Killexams 000-M86 study guide |


IBM Commerce Solutions Order Mgmt Technical Mastery Test v1

Pass 4 certain P2050-004 dumps | Killexams.com P2050-004 existent questions | http://ajo.se/

HP TouchPad Needs 6 to 8 Weeks for Additional Shipments | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

First Name: Last Name: E-mail Address: Password: Confirm Password: Username:

Title: C-Level/President Manager VP Staff (Associate/Analyst/etc.) Director

Function:

Role in IT decision-making process: Align business & IT Goals Create IT Strategy Determine IT Needs Manage Vendor Relationships Evaluate/Specify Brands or Vendors Other Role commission Purchases Not Involved

Work Phone: Company: Company Size: Industry: Street Address City: Zip/postal code State/Province: Country:

Occasionally, they ship subscribers special offers from select partners. Would you dote to receive these special colleague offers via e-mail? Yes No

Your registration with Eweek will comprehend the following free email newsletter(s): news & Views

By submitting your wireless number, you disagree that eWEEK, its related properties, and vendor partners providing content you view may contact you using contact hub technology. Your consent is not required to view content or utilize site features.

By clicking on the "Register" button below, I disagree that I own carefully read the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy and I disagree to exist legally bound by every bit of such terms.

Register

Continue without consent      

Modeled larval connectivity of a multi-species reef fish and invertebrate assemblage off the coast of Moloka‘i, Hawai‘i | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

Introduction

Knowledge of population connectivity is necessary for effective management in marine environments (Mitarai, Siegel & Winters, 2008; Botsford et al., 2009; Toonen et al., 2011). For many species of marine invertebrate and reef fish, dispersal is mostly limited to the pelagic larval life stage. Therefore, an understanding of larval dispersal patterns is captious for studying population dynamics, connectivity, and conservation in the marine environment (Jones, Srinivasan & Almany, 2007; Lipcius et al., 2008; Gaines et al., 2010; Toonen et al., 2011). Many coastal and reef species own a bi-phasic life history in which adults display limited geographic sweep and high site fidelity, while larvae are pelagic and highly mobile (Thorson, 1950; Scheltema, 1971; Strathmann, 1993; Marshall et al., 2012). This life history strategy is not only common to sessile invertebrates such as corals or limpets; many reef fish species own been shown to own a home sweep of <1 km as adults (Meyer et al., 2000; Meyer, Papastamatiou & Clark, 2010). Depending on species, the mobile planktonic stage can terminal from hours to months and has the potential to transport larvae up to hundreds of kilometers away from a site of origin (Scheltema, 1971; Richmond, 1987; Shanks, 2009). scholarship of larval dispersal patterns can exist used to inform effective management, such as marine spatial management strategies that sustain source populations of breeding individuals capable of dispersing offspring to other areas.

Both biological and physical factors repercussion larval dispersal, although the relative consequence of these factors is likely variable among species and sites and remains debated (Levin, 2006; Paris, Chérubin & Cowen, 2007; Cowen & Sponaugle, 2009; White et al., 2010). In situ data on pelagic larvae are sparse; marine organisms at this life stage are difficult to capture and identify, and are typically organize in low densities across big areas of the open ocean (Clarke, 1991; Wren & Kobayashi, 2016). A variety of genetic and chemistry techniques own therefore been developed to estimate larval connectivity (Gillanders, 2005; Leis, Siebeck & Dixson, 2011; Toonen et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2018). Computer models informed by field and laboratory data own likewise become a valuable implement for estimating larval dispersal and population connectivity (Paris, Chérubin & Cowen, 2007; Botsford et al., 2009; Sponaugle et al., 2012; Kough, Paris & Butler IV, 2013; Wood et al., 2014). Individual-based models, or IBMs, can incorporate both biological and physical factors known to influence larval movement. Pelagic larval duration (PLD), for example, is the amount of time a larva spends in the water column before settlement and can vary widely among or even within species ( Toonen & Pawlik, 2001). PLD affects how far an individual can exist successfully transported by ocean currents, and so is expected to directly move connectivity patterns (Siegel et al., 2003; Shanks, 2009; Dawson et al., 2014). In addition to PLD, adult reproductive strategy and timing (Carson et al., 2010; Portnoy et al., 2013), fecundity (Castorani et al., 2017), larval mortality (Vikebøet al., 2007), and larval developmental, morphological, and behavioral characteristics (Paris, Chérubin & Cowen, 2007) may every bit of play a role in shaping connectivity patterns. Physical factors such as temperature, bathymetry, and current direction can likewise substantially influence connectivity (Cowen & Sponaugle, 2009). In this study, they incorporated both biotic and abiotic components in an IBM coupled with an oceanographic model to prognosticate fine-scale patterns of larval exchange around the island of Moloka‘i in the Hawaiian archipelago.

The main Hawaiian Islands are located in the middle of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, and are bordered by the North Hawaiian Ridge current along the northern coasts of the islands and the Hawaii Lee Current along the southern coasts, both of which flee east to west and are driven by the prevalent easterly trade winds (Lumpkin, 1998; Friedlander et al., 2005). The Hawai‘i Lee Countercurrent, which runs along the southern perimeter of the chain, flows west to east (Lumpkin, 1998). The pattern of mesoscale eddies around the islands is tangled and varies seasonally (Friedlander et al., 2005; Vaz et al., 2013).

Hawaiian marine communities puss unprecedented pressures, including coastal development, overexploitation, disease, and increasing temperature and acidification due to climate change (Smith, 1993; Lowe, 1995; Coles & Brown, 2003; Friedlander et al., 2003; Friedlander et al., 2005; Aeby, 2006). Declines in Hawaiian marine resources bicker for implementation of a more holistic approach than traditional single-species maximum sustainable succumb techniques, which own proven ineffective (Goodyear, 1996; Hilborn, 2011). There is a general movement toward the utilize of ecosystem-based management, which requires scholarship of ecosystem structure and connectivity patterns to establish and manage marine spatial planning areas (Slocombe, 1993; Browman et al., 2004; Pikitch et al., 2004; Arkema, Abramson & Dewsbury, 2006). Kalaupapa National Historical Park is a federal marine protected locality (MPA) located on the north shore of Moloka‘i, an island in the Maui Nui tangled of the Hawaiian archipelago, that includes submerged lands and waters up to 1 4 mile offshore (NOAA, 2009). At least five IUCN red-listed coral species own been identified within this area (Kenyon, Maragos & Fenner, 2011), and in 2010 the Park showed the greatest fish biomass and species diversity out of four Hawaiian National Parks surveyed (Beets, Brown & Friedlander, 2010). One of the major benefits expected of MPAs is that the protected waters within the locality provide a source of larval spillover to other sites on the island, seeding these areas for commercial, recreational, and subsistence fishing (McClanahan & Mangi, 2000; Halpern & Warner, 2003; Lester et al., 2009).

In this study, they used a Lagrangian particle-tracking IBM (Wong-Ala et al., 2018) to simulate larval dispersal around Moloka‘i and to estimate the larval exchange among sites at the scale of an individual island. They own parameterized their model with biological data for eleven species covering a breadth of Hawaiian reef species life histories (e.g., habitat preferences, larval behaviors, and pelagic larval durations, Table 1), and of interest to both the local community and resource managers. Their goals were to examine patterns of species-specific connectivity, characterize the location and relative magnitude of connections around Moloka‘i, report sites of potential management relevance, and address the question of whether Kalaupapa National Historical Park provides larval spillover for adjacent sites on Moloka‘i, or connections to the adjacent islands of Hawai‘i, Maui, O‘ahu, Lana‘i, and Kaho‘olawe.

Table 1:

Target taxa selected for the study, based on cultural, ecological, and/or economic importance.

PLD = pelagic larval duration. Short dispersers (3–25 day minimum PLD) in white, medium dispersers (30–50 day minimum PLD) in light gray, and long dispersers (140–270 day minimum PLD) in gloomy gray. Spawn season and timing from traditional ecological scholarship shared by cultural practitioners on the island. Asterisk indicates that congener-level data was used. Commonname Scientific name Spawn type # of larvae spawned Spawningday of year Spawning hour of day Spawning moon phase Larval depth (m) PLD (days) Habitat ’Opihi/ Limpet Cellana spp. Broadcast1 861,300 1–60 & 121–181 – New 0–5 3–181,2 Intertidal1 Ko’a/ Cauliflower coral Pocillopora meandrina Broadcast3 1,671,840 91–151 07:15–08:00 Full 0–54 5–90*5 Reef He’e/ Octopus Octopus cyanea Benthic6 1,392,096 1–360 – – 50–100 216 Reef, rubble7 Moi/ Pacific threadfin Polydactylus sexfilis Broadcast 1,004,640 152–243 – – 50–1008 259 Sand10 Uhu uliuli/ Spectacled parrotfish Chlorurus perspicillatus Broadcast 1,404,792 152–212 – – 0–120*11 30*12 Reef10 Uhu palukaluka/ Reddlip parrotfish Scarus rubroviolaceus Broadcast 1,404,792 152–212 – – 0–120*11 30*12 Rock, reef10 Kumu/ Whitesaddle Goatfish Parupeneus porphyreus Broadcast 1,071,252 32–90 – – 0–50*11 41–56*12 Sand, rock, reef10 Kole/ Spotted surgeonfish Ctenochaetus strigosus Broadcast 1,177,200 60–120 – – 50–10011 50*12 Rock, reef, rubble10 ‘Ōmilu/ Bluefin trevally Caranx melampygus Broadcast 1,310,616 121–243 – – 0–80*11 140*13,14 Sand, reef10 Ulua/ Giant trevally Caranx ignoblis Broadcast 1,151,040 152–243 – Full 0–80*11 14013,14 Sand, rock, reef10 Ula/ Spiny lobster Panulirus spp. Benthic15 1,573,248 152–243 – – 50–10016 27017 Rock, pavement16 Methods Circulation model

We selected the hydrodynamic model MITgcm, which is designed for the study of dynamical processes in the ocean on a horizontal scale. This model solves incompressible Navier–Stokes equations to report the motion of viscous fluid on a sphere, discretized using a finite-volume technique (Marshall et al., 1997). The one-km resolution MITgcm domain for this study extends from 198.2°E to 206°E and from 17°N to 22.2°N, an locality that includes the islands of Moloka‘i, Maui, Lana‘i, Kaho‘olawe, O‘ahu, and Hawai‘i. While Ni‘ihau and southern Kaua’i likewise descend within the domain, they discarded connectivity to these islands because they prevaricate within the 0.5° border zone of the current model. border conditions are enforced over 20 grid points on every bit of sides of the model domain. Vertically, the model is divided into 50 layers that multiply in thickness with depth, from five m at the surface (0.0–5.0 m) to 510 m at the ground (4,470 –4,980 m). Model variables were initialized using the output of a Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) at a horizontal resolution of 0.04° (∼four km) configured for the main Hawaiian Islands, using the general Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans database (GEBCO, 1/60°) (Jia et al., 2011).

The simulation runs from March 31st, 2011 to July 30th, 2013 with a temporal resolution of 24 h and shows seasonal eddies as well as persistent mesoscale features (Fig. S1). They execute not comprehend tides in the model due to temporal resolution. Their model era represents a neutral ocean state; no El Niño or La Niña events occurred during this time period. To ground-truth the circulation model, they compared surface current output to real-time trajectories of surface drifters from the GDP Drifter Data Assembly hub (Fig. S2) (Elipot et al., 2016), as well as other current models of the locality (Wren et al., 2016; Storlazzi et al., 2017).

Biological model

To simulate larval dispersal, they used a modified version of the Wong-Ala et al. (2018) IBM, a 3D Lagrangian particle-tracking model written in the R programming language (R Core Team, 2017). The model takes the aforementioned MITgcm current products as input, as well as shoreline shapefiles extracted from the replete resolution NOAA Global Self-consistent Hierarchical High-resolution Geography database, v2.3.0 (Wessel & Smith, 1996). Their model included 65 land masses within the geographic domain, the largest being the island of Hawai‘i and the smallest being Pu‘uki‘i Island, a 1.5-acre islet off the eastern coast of Maui. To model depth, they used the one arc-minute-resolution ETOPO1 bathymetry, extracted using the R package ‘marmap’ (Amante & Eakins, 2009; Pante & Simon-Bouhet, 2013).

Each species was simulated with a divide model run. Larvae were modeled from spawning to settlement and were transported at each timestep (t = 2 h) by advection-diffusion transport. This transport consisted of (1) advective displacement caused by water flow, consisting of east (u) and north (v) velocities read from daily MITgcm files, and (2) additional random-walk displacement, using a diffusion constant of 0.2 m2/s−1 (Lowe et al., 2009). vertical velocities (w) were not implemented by the model; details of vertical larval movement are described below. Advection was interpolated between data points at each timestep using an Eulerian 2D barycentric interpolation method. They chose this implementation over a more computationally intensive interpolation manner (i.e., fourth-order Runge–Kutta) because they did not celebrate a inequity at this timestep length. Biological processes modeled comprehend PLD, reproduction timing and location, mortality, and ontogenetic changes in vertical distribution; these qualities were parameterized via species-specific data obtained from previous studies and from the local fishing and management community (Table 1).

Larvae were released from habitat-specific spawning sites and were considered settled if they fell within a roughly one-km contour around reef or intertidal habitat at the wait of their pelagic larval duration. Distance from habitat was used rather than water depth because Penguin Bank, a relatively shallow bank to the southwest of Moloka‘i, does not delineate suitable habitat for reef-associated species. PLD for each larva was a randomly assigned value between the minimum and maximum PLD for that species, and larvae were removed from the model if they had reached their PLD and were not within a settlement zone. No data on pre-competency era were available for their study species, so this parameter was not included. Mortality rates were calculated as larval half-lives; e.g., one-half of every bit of larvae were assumed to own survived at one-half of the maximum PLD for that species (following Holstein, Paris & Mumby, 2014). Since their focus was on potential connectivity pathways, reproductive rates were calibrated to allow for saturation of feasible settlement sites, equating from ∼900,000 to ∼1,7000,000 larvae released depending on species. Fecundity was therefore derived not from biological data, but from computational minimums.

Development, and resulting ontogenetic changes in behavior, is specific to the life history of each species. Broadcast-spawning species with weakly-swimming larvae (P. meandrina and Cellana spp., Table 1) were transported as passive particles randomly distributed between 0–5 m depth (Storlazzi, Brown & Field, 2006). Previous studies own demonstrated that fish larvae own a high degree of control over their vertical position in the water column (Irisson et al., 2010; Huebert, Cowen & Sponaugle, 2011). Therefore, they modeled broadcast-spawning fish species with a 24-hour passive buoyant angle to simulate eggs pre-hatch, followed by a pelagic larval angle with a species-specific depth distribution. For C. ignoblis, C. melampygus, P. porphyreus, C. perspicillatus, and S. rubroviolaceus, they used genus-level depth distributions (Fig. S3) obtained from the 1996 NOAA ichthyoplankton vertical distributions data report (Boehlert & Mundy, 1996). P. sexfilis and C. strigosus larvae were randomly distributed between 50–100 m (Boehlert, Watson & Sun, 1992). Benthic brooding species (O. cyanea and Panulirus spp.) execute not own a passive buoyant phase, and thus were released as larvae randomly distributed between 50–100 m. At each time step, a larva’s depth was checked against bathymetry, and was assigned to the nearest available layer if the species-specific depth was not available at these coordinates.

For data-poor species, they used congener-level estimates for PLD (see Table 1). For example, there is no estimate of larval duration for Caranx species, but in Hawai‘i peak spawning occurs in May–July and peak recruitment in August–December (Sudekum, 1984; Longenecker, Langston & Barrett, 2008). In consultation with resource managers and community members, a PLD of 140 days was chosen pending future data that indicates a more accurate pelagic period.

Habitat selection

Spawning sites were generated using data from published literature and modified after input from autochthonous Hawaiian cultural practitioners and the Moloka‘i fishing community (Fig. 1). Species-specific habitat suitability was inferred from the 2013–2016 Marine Biogeographic Assessment of the Main Hawaiian Islands (Costa & Kendall, 2016). They designated coral habitat as areas with 5–90% coral cover, or ≥1 site-specific coral species richness, for a total of 127 spawning sites on Moloka‘i. Habitat for reef invertebrates followed coral habitat, with additional sites added after community feedback for a total of 136 sites. Areas with a predicted reef fish biomass of 58–1,288 g/m2 were designated as reef fish habitat (Stamoulis et al., 2016), for a total of 109 spawning sites. Sand habitat was designated as 90–100% uncolonized for a total of 115 sites. Intertidal habitat was designated as any rocky shoreline locality not covered by sand or mud, for a total of 87 sites. Number of adults was assumed equal at every bit of sites. For regional analysis, they pooled sites into groups of two to 11 sites based on benthic habitat and surrounding geography (Fig. 1A). Adjacent sites were grouped if they shared the identical benthic habitat classification and prevalent wave direction, and/or were fragment of the identical reef tract.

Figure 1: Spawning sites used in the model by species. (A) C. perspicillatus, S. rubroviolaceus, P. porphyreus, C. strigosus, C. ignoblis, and C. melampygus, n = 109; (B) P. meandrina, n = 129;(C) O. cyanea and Panulirus spp., n = 136; (D) P. sexfilis, n = 115; and (E) Cellana spp., n = 87. Region names are displayed over associated spawning sites for fish species in (A). Regions are made up of two to 11 sites, grouped based on coastal geography and surrounding benthic habitat, and are designated in (A) by adjacent colored dots. Kalaupapa National Historical Park is highlighted in light green in (A). Source–sink dynamics and local retention

Dispersal distance was measured via the distm duty in the R package ‘geosphere’, which calculates distance between geographical points via the Haversine formula (Hijmans, 2016). This distance, measured between spawn and settlement locations, was used to calculate dispersal kernels to examine and compare species-specific distributions. They likewise measured local retention, or the percentage of successful settlers from a site that were retained at that site (i.e., settlers at site A that originated from site A/total successful settlers that originated from site A). To estimate the role of specific sites around Moloka‘i, they likewise calculated a source–sink index for each species (Holstein, Paris & Mumby, 2014; Wren et al., 2016). This index defines sites as either a source, in which a site’s successful export to other sites is greater than its import, or a sink, in which import from other sites is greater than successful export. It is calculated by dividing the inequity between number of successfully exported and imported larvae by the sum of every bit of successfully exported and imported larvae. A value <0 indicates that a site acts as a net sink, while a value >0 indicates that a site acts as a net source. While they measured successful dispersal to adjacent islands, they did not spawn larvae from them, and therefore these islands delineate exogenous sinks. For this reason, settlement to other islands was not included in source–sink index calculations.

We likewise calculated settlement symmetry between different regions for each species (Calabrese & Fagan, 2004). They calculated the forward settlement proportion, i.e., the symmetry of settlers from a specific settlement site (s) originating from an observed source site (o), by scaling the number of successful settlers from site o settling at site s to every bit of successful settlers originating from site o. Forward symmetry can exist represented as Pso = Sos∕∑So. They likewise calculated rearward settlement proportion, or the symmetry of settlers from a specific source site (o) observed at settlement site (s), by scaling the number of settlers observed at site s originating from site o to every bit of settlers observed at site s. The rearward symmetry can exist represented as Pos = Sos∕∑Ss.

Graph-theoretic analysis

To quantify connections between sites, they applied graph theory to population connectivity (Treml et al., 2008; Holstein, Paris & Mumby, 2014). Graph theoretic analysis is highly scalable and can exist used to examine fine-scale networks between reef sites up to broad-scale analyses between islands or archipelagos, mapping to both local and regional management needs. It likewise allows for both network- and site-specific metrics, enabling the comparison of connectivity between species and habitat sites as well as highlighting potential multi-generational dispersal corridors. Graph theory likewise provides a powerful implement for spatial visualization, allowing for rapid, intuitive communication of connectivity results to researchers, managers, and the public alike. This character of analysis can exist used to model pairwise relationships between spatial data points by breaking down individual-based output into a sequence of nodes (habitat sites) and edges (directed connections between habitat sites). They then used these nodes and edges to examine the relative consequence of each site and dispersal pathway to the greater pattern of connectivity around Moloka‘i, as well as differences in connectivity patterns between species (Treml et al., 2008; Holstein, Paris & Mumby, 2014). They used the R package ‘igraph’ to examine several measures of within-island connectivity (Csardi & Nepusz, 2006). Edge density, or the symmetry of realized edges out of every bit of feasible edges, is a multi-site measure of connectivity. Areas with a higher edge density own more direct connections between habitat sites, and thus are more strongly connected. They measured edge density along and between the north, south, east, and west coasts of Moloka‘i to examine feasible population structure and degree of exchange among the marine resources of local communities.

The distribution of shortest path length is likewise informative for comparing overall connectivity. In graph theory, a shortest path is the minimum number of steps needed to connect two sites. For example, two sites that exchange larvae in either direction are connected by a shortest path of one, whereas if they both share larvae with an intermediate site but not with each other, they are connected by a shortest path of two. In a biological context, shortest path can correspond to number of generations needed for exchange: sites with a shortest path of two require two generations to fabricate a connection. incurious shortest path, therefore, is a descriptive statistic to estimate connectivity of a network. If two sites are unconnected, it is feasible to own infinite-length shortest paths; here, these sempiternal values were famed but not included in final analyses.

Networks can likewise exist broken in connected components (Csardi & Nepusz, 2006). A weakly connected component (WCC) is a subgraph in which every bit of nodes are not reachable by other nodes. A network split into multiple WCCs indicates divide populations that execute not exchange any individuals, and a big number of WCCs indicates a low degree of island-wide connectivity. A strongly connected component (SCC) is a subgraph in which every bit of nodes are directly connected and indicates a high degree of connectivity. A region with many wee SCCs can attest high local connectivity but low island-wide connectivity. Furthermore, component analysis can identify slit nodes, or nodes that, if removed, smash a network into multiple WCCs. Pinpointing these slit nodes can identify potential distinguished sites for preserving a population’s connectivity, and could inform predictions about the repercussion of site loss (e.g., a large-scale coral bleaching event) on overall connectivity.

On a regional scale, it is distinguished to note which sites are exporting larvae to, or importing larvae from, other sites. To this end, they examined in-degree and out-degree for each region. In-degree refers to the number of inward-directed edges to a specific node, or how many other sites provide larvae into site ‘A’. Out-degree refers to the number of outward-directed edges from a specific node, or how many sites receive larvae from site ‘A’. Habitat sites with a high out-degree seed a big number of other sites, and attest potentially distinguished larval sources, while habitat sites with a low in-degree rely on a limited number of larval sources and may therefore exist conditional on connections with these few other sites to maintain population size. Finally, betweenness centrality (BC) refers to the number of shortest paths that pass through a given node, and may therefore attest connectivity pathways or ‘chokepoints’ that are distinguished to overall connectivity on a multigenerational timescale. BC was weighted with the symmetry of dispersal as described in the preceding section. They calculated in-degree, out-degree, and weighted betweenness centrality for each region in the network for each species.

As with the source–sink index, they did not comprehend sites on islands other than Moloka‘i in their calculations of edge density, shortest paths, connected components, slit nodes, in- and out-degree, or betweenness centrality in order to focus on within-island patterns of connectivity.

Results Effects of biological parameters on fine-scale connectivity patterns

The species-specific parameters that were available to parameterize the dispersal models substantially influenced final output (Fig. 2). The symmetry of successful settlers (either to Moloka‘i or to neighboring islands) varied widely by species, from 2% (Panulirus spp.) to 25% (Cellana spp.). Minimum pelagic duration and settlement success were negatively correlated (e.g., an estimated −0.79 Pearson correlation coefficient). Species modeled with batch spawning at a specific moon angle and/or time of day (Cellana spp., P. meandrina, and C. ignoblis) displayed slightly higher settlement success than similar species modeled with constant spawning over specific months. On a smaller scale, they likewise examined incurious site-scale local retention, comparing only retention to the spawning site versus other sites on Moloka‘i (Fig. 2). Local retention was lowest for Caranx spp. (<1%) and highest for O. cyanea and P. sexfilis (8.1% and 10%, respectively).

Figure 2: Summary statistics for each species network. Summary statistics are displayed in order of increasing minimum pelagic larval duration from left to right. Heatmap colors are based on normalized values from 0–1 for each analysis. Successful settlement refers to the symmetry of larvae settled out of the total number of larvae spawned. Local retention is measured as the symmetry of larvae spawned from a site that settle at the identical site. Shortest path is measured as the minimum number of steps needed to connect two sites. Strongly connected sites refers to the symmetry of sites in a network that belong to a strongly connected component. exist distinguished dispersal distance is measured in kilometers from spawn site to settlement site.

We measured network-wide connectivity via distribution of shortest paths, or the minimum number of steps between a given two nodes in a network, only including sites on Moloka‘i (Fig. 2). O. cyanea and P. sexfilis showed the smallest shortest paths overall, import that on average, it would win fewer generations for these species to demographically bridge any given pair of sites. Using maximum shortest path, it could win these species three generations at most to connect sites. Cellana spp. and P. meandrina, by comparison, could win as many as five generations. Other medium- and long-dispersing species showed relatively equivalent shortest-path distributions, with trevally species showing the highest exist distinguished path length and therefore the lowest island-scale connectivity.

The number and size of weakly-connected and strongly-connected components in a network is likewise an informative measure of connectivity (Fig. 2). No species in their study group was broken into multiple weakly-connected components; however, there were species-specific patterns of strongly connected sites. O. cyanea and P. sexfilis were the most strongly connected, with every bit of sites in the network falling into a sole SCC. Cellana spp. and P. meandrina each had approximately 60% of sites included in a SCC, but both demonstrate fragmentation with seven and six SCCs respectively, ranging in size from two to 22 sites. This SCC pattern suggests low global connectivity but high local connectivity for these species. Medium and long dispersers showed larger connected components; 70% of parrotfish sites fell within two SCCs; 40% of P. porphyreus sites fell within two SCCs; 70% of C. strigosus sites, 55% of C. melampygus sites, and 40% of Panulirus sites fell within a sole SCC. In contrast, only 26% of C. ignoblis sites fell within a sole SCC. It is likewise distinguished to note that the lower connectivity scores observed in long-dispersing species likely reflect a larger scale of connectivity. Species with a shorter PLD are highly connected at reef and island levels but may demonstrate weaker connections between islands. Species with a longer PLD, such as trevally or spiny lobster, are likely more highly connected at inter-island scales which reflects the lower connectivity scores per island shown here.

Figure 3: Dispersal distance density kernels. Dispersal distance is combined across species by minimum pelagic larval duration (PLD) length in days (short, medium, or long). Most short dispersers settle nearby to home, while few long dispersers are retained at or near their spawning sites.

Minimum PLD was positively correlated with exist distinguished dispersal distance (e.g., an estimated 0.88 Pearson correlation coefficient with minimum pelagic duration loge-transformed to linearize the relationship), and dispersal kernels differed between species that are short dispersers (3–25 days), medium dispersers (30–50 days), or long dispersers (140–270 days) (Fig. 3). Short dispersers travelled a exist distinguished distance of 24.06 ± 31.33 km, medium dispersers travelled a exist distinguished distance of 52.71 ± 40.37 km, and long dispersers travelled the farthest, at a exist distinguished of 89.41 ± 41.43 km. However, regardless of PLD, there were essentially two peaks of exist distinguished dispersal: a short-distance peak of <30 km, and a long-distance peak of roughly 50–125 km (Fig. 3). The short-distance peak largely represents larvae that settle back to Moloka‘i, while the long-distance peak largely represents settlement to other islands; the low point between them corresponds to deep-water channels between islands, i.e., unsuitable habitat for settlement. Median dispersal distance for short dispersers was substantially less than the exist distinguished at 8.85 km, indicating that most of these larvae settled relatively nearby to their spawning sites, with rare long-distance dispersal events bringing up the average. Median distance for medium (54.22 km) and long (91.57 km) dispersers was closer to the mean, indicating more even distance distributions and thus a higher probability of long-distance dispersal for these species. Maximum dispersal distance varied between ∼150–180 km depending on species, except for the spiny lobster Panulirus spp., with a PLD of 270 d and a maximum dispersal distance of approximately 300 km.

Settlement to Moloka‘i and other islands in the archipelago

Different species showed different forward settlement symmetry to adjacent islands (Fig. 4), although every species in the study group successfully settled back to Moloka‘i. P. meandrina showed the highest percentage of island-scale local retention (82%), while C. ignoblis showed the lowest (7%). An incurious of 74% of larvae from short-dispersing species settled back to Moloka‘i, as compared to an incurious of 41% of medium dispersers and 9% of long dispersers. A big symmetry of larvae likewise settled to O‘ahu, with longer PLDs resulting in greater proportions, ranging from 14% of O. cyanea to 88% of C. ignoblis. Moloka‘i and O‘ahu were the most commonly settled islands by percentage. Overall, settlement from Moloka‘i to Lana‘i, Maui, Kaho‘olawe, and Hawai‘i was reasonably lower. Larvae of every species settled to Lana‘i, and settlement to this island made up less than 5% of settled larvae across every bit of species. Likewise, settlement to Maui made up less than 7% of settlement across species, with P. meandrina as the only species that had no successful paths from Moloka‘i to Maui. Settlement to Kaho‘olawe and Hawai‘i was less common, with the exception of Panulirus spp., which had 16% of every bit of settled larvae on Hawai‘i.

Figure 4: Forward settlement from Moloka’i to other islands. Proportion of simulated larvae settled to each island from Moloka‘i by species, organized in order of increasing minimum pelagic larval duration from left to right.

We likewise examined coast-specific patterns of rearward settlement symmetry to other islands, discarding connections with a very low symmetry of larvae (<0.1% of total larvae of that species settling to other islands). Averaged across species, 83% of larvae settling to O‘ahu from Moloka‘i were spawned on the north shore of Moloka‘i, with 12% spawned on the west shore (Fig. S4). Spawning sites on the east and south shores contributed <5% of every bit of larvae settling to O‘ahu from Moloka‘i. The east and south shores of Moloka‘i had the highest incurious percentage of larvae settling to Lana‘i from Moloka‘i, at 78% and 20% respectively, and to Kaho‘olawe from Moloka‘i at 63% and 34%. Of the species that settled to Maui from Moloka‘i, on incurious most were spawned on the east (53%) or north (39%) shores, as were the species that settled to Hawai‘i Island from Moloka‘i (22% east, 76% north). These patterns attest that multiple coasts of Moloka‘i own the potential to export larvae to neighboring islands.

Temporal settlement profiles likewise varied by species (Fig. 5). Species modeled with moon-phase spawning and relatively short settlement windows (Cellana spp. and C. ignoblis) were characterized by discrete settlement pulses, whereas other species showed settlement over a broader era of time. Some species likewise showed distinctive patterns of settlement to other islands; their model suggests specific windows when long-distance dispersal is possible, as well as times of year when local retention is maximized (Fig. 5).

Figure 5: Species-specific temporal recruitment patterns. Proportion densities of settlement to specific islands from Moloka‘i based on day of year settled, by species. Rare dispersal events (e.g., Maui or Lana‘i for Cellana spp.) appear as narrow spikes, while broad distributions generally attest more common settlement pathways. Regional patterns of connectivity in Moloka‘i coastal waters

Within Moloka‘i, their model predicts that coast-specific population structure is likely; averaged across every bit of species, 84% of individuals settled back to the identical coast on which they were spawned rather than a different coast on Moloka‘i. Excluding connections with a very low symmetry of larvae (<0.1% of total larvae of that species that settled to Moloka‘i), they organize that the symmetry of coast-scale local retention was generally higher than dispersal to another coast, with the exception of the west coast (Fig. 6A). The north and south coasts had a high degree of local retention in every species except for the long-dispersing Panulirus spp., and the east coast likewise had high local retention overall. Between coasts, a high symmetry of larvae that spawned on the west coast settled on the north coast, and a lesser amount of larvae were exchanged from the east to south and from the north to east. With a few species-specific exceptions, larval exchange between other coasts of Moloka‘i was negligible.

Figure 6: Coast-by-coast patterns of connectivity on Moloka‘i. (A) incurious rearward settlement symmetry by species per pair of coastlines, calculated by the number of larvae settling at site s from site o divided by every bit of settled larvae at site s. Directional coastline pairs (Spawn > Settlement) are ordered from left to birthright by increasing median settlement proportion. (B) Heatmap of edge density for coast-specific networks by species. Density is calculated by the number of every bit of realized paths out of total feasible paths, disregarding directionality.

We likewise calculated edge density, including every bit of connections between coasts on Moloka‘i regardless of settlement symmetry (Fig. 6B). The eastern coast was particularly well-connected, with an edge density between 0.14 and 0.44, depending on the species. The southern shore showed high edge density for short and medium dispersers (0.16–0.39) but low for long dispersers (<0.005). The north shore likewise showed relatively high edge density (0.20 on average), although these values were smaller for long dispersers. The west coast showed very low edge density, with the exceptions of O. cyanea (0.37) and P. sexfilis (0.13). Virtually every bit of networks that included two coasts showed lower edge density. One exception was the east/south shore network, which had an edge density of 0.10–0.65 except for Cellana spp. Across species, edge density between the south and west coasts was 0.12 on average, and between the east and west coasts was 0.04 on average. Edge density between north and south coasts was particularly low for every bit of species (<0.05), a divide that was especially discrete in Cellana spp. and P. meandrina, which showed zero realized connections between these coasts. Although northern and southern populations are potentially weakly connected by sites along the eastern ( P. meandrina) or western (Cellana spp.) shores, their model predicts very little, if any, demographic connectivity.

To explore patterns of connectivity on a finer scale, they pooled sites into regions (as defined in Fig. 1) in order to anatomize relationships between these regions. Arranging model output into node-edge networks clarified pathways and regions of note, and revealed several patterns which did not follow simple predictions based on PLD (Fig. 7). Cellana spp. and P. meandrina showed the most fragmentation, with several SCCs and low connectivity between coasts. Connectivity was highest in O. cyanea and P. sexfilis, which had a sole SCC containing every bit of regions. Medium and long dispersers generally showed fewer strongly connected regions on the south shore than the north shore, with the exception of C. strigosus. P. porphyreus showed more strongly connected regions east of Kalaupapa but lower connectivity on the western half of the island.

Figure 7: Moloka’i connectivity networks by species. Graph-theoretic networks between regions around Moloka’i by species arranged in order of minimum pelagic larval duration. (A–D) Short dispersers (3–25 days), (E–G) medium dispersers (30–50 days), and (H–J) long dispersers (140–270 days). Node size reflects betweenness centrality of each region, scaled per species for visibility. Node color reflects out-degree of each region; yellow nodes own a low out-degree, red nodes own a medium out-degree, and black nodes own a high out-degree. Red edges are connections in a strongly connected component, while gray edges are not fragment of a strongly connected component (although may soundless delineate substantial connections). Edge thickness represents log-transformed symmetry of dispersal along that edge.

Region-level networks showed both species-specific and species-wide patterns of connectivity (Fig. 8). With a few exceptions, sites along the eastern coast—notably, Cape Halawa and Pauwalu Harbor—showed relatively high betweenness centrality, and may therefore act as multigenerational pathways between north-shore and south-shore populations. In Cellana spp., Leinapapio Point and Mokio Point had the highest BC, while in high-connectivity O. cyanea and P. sexfilis, regions on the west coast had high BC scores. P. meandrina and C. strigosus showed several regions along the south shore with high BC. For Cellana spp. and P. meandrina, regions in the northeast had the highest out-degree, and therefore seeded the greatest number of other sites with larvae (Fig. 8). Correspondingly, regions in the northwest (and southwest in the case of P. meandrina) showed the highest in-degree. For O. cyanea and P. sexfilis, regions on the western and southern coasts showed the highest out-degree. For most species, both out-degree and in-degree were generally highest on the northern and eastern coasts, suggesting higher connectivity in these areas.

Figure 8: Region-level summary statistics across every bit of species. Betweenness centrality is a measure of the number of paths that pass through a certain region; a high score suggests potentially distinguished multi-generation connectivity pathways. In-degree and out-degree mention to the amount of a node’s incoming and outgoing connections. Betweenness centrality, in-degree, and out-degree own every bit of been normalized to values between 0 to 1 per species. Local retention is measured as the symmetry of larvae that settled back to their spawn site out of every bit of larvae spawned at that site. Source-sink index is a measure of net export or import; negative values (blue) attest a net larval sink, while positive values (red) attest a net larval source. White indicates that a site is neither a strong source nor sink. Gray values for Cellana spp. denote a lack of suitable habitat sites in that particular region.

Several species-wide hotspots of local retention emerged, particularly East Kalaupapa Peninsula/Leinaopapio Point, the northeast point of Moloka‘i, and the middle of the south shore. Some species likewise showed some degree of local retention west of Kalaupapa Peninsula. While local retention was observed in the long-dispersing Caranx spp. and Panulirus spp., this amount was essentially negligible. In terms of source–sink dynamics, Ki‘oko‘o, Pu‘ukaoku Point, and West Kalaupapa Peninsula, every bit of on the north shore, were the only sites that consistently acted as a net source, exporting more larvae than they import (Fig. 8). Kaunakakai Harbor, Lono Harbor, and Mokio Point acted as net sinks across every bit of species. Puko‘o, Pauwalu Harbor, and Cape Halawa were either debilitated net sources or neither sources nor sinks, which corresponds to the high levels of local retention observed at these sites. Pala‘au and Mo‘omomi acted as either debilitated sinks or sources for short dispersers and as sources for long dispersers.

Only four networks showed regional cut-nodes, or nodes that, if removed, smash a network into multiple weakly-connected components (Fig. S5). Cellana spp. showed two cut-nodes: Mokio Point in northwest Moloka‘i and La‘au Point in southwest Moloka‘i, which if removed isolated wee Bay and Lono Harbor, respectively. C. perspicillatus, and S. rubroviolaceus showed a similar pattern in regards to Mokio Point; removal of this node isolated wee Bay in this species as well. In C. ignoblis, loss of Pauwalu Harbor isolated Lono Harbor, and loss of Pala‘au isolated Ilio Point on the northern coast. Finally, in Panulirus spp., loss of Leinaopapio Point isolated Papuhaku Beach, since Leinapapio Point was the only larval source from Moloka‘i for Papuhaku Beach in this species.

Figure 9: Connectivity matrix for larvae spawned on Kalaupapa Peninsula. Includes larvae settled on Molokaí (regions below horizontal black line) and those settled on other islands (regions above horizontal black line), spawned from either the east (E) or west (W) coast of Kalaupapa. Heatmap colors delineate rearward proportion, calculated by the number of larvae settling at site s from site o divided by every bit of settled larvae at site s. White squares attest no dispersal along this path. The role of Kalaupapa Peninsula in inter- and intra-island connectivity

Our model suggests that Kalaupapa National Historical Park may play a role in inter-island connectivity, especially in terms of long-distance dispersal. Out of every bit of regions on Moloka‘i, East Kalaupapa Peninsula was the sole largest exporter of larvae to Hawai‘i Island, accounting for 19% of every bit of larvae transported from Moloka‘i to this island; West Kalaupapa Peninsula accounted for another 10%. The park likewise contributed 22% of every bit of larvae exported from Moloka‘i to O‘ahu, and successfully exported a smaller percentage of larvae to Maui, Lana‘i, and Kaho‘olawe (Fig. 9). Kalaupapa was not marked as a cut-node for any species, import that replete population breaks are not predicted in the case of habitat or population loss in this area. Nevertheless, in their model Kalaupapa exported larvae to multiple regions along the north shore in every bit of species, as well as regions along the east, south, and/or west shores in most species networks (Figs. 9 and 10). The park may play a particularly distinguished role for long-dispersing species; settlement from Kalaupapa made up 18%–29% of every bit of successful settlement in Caranx spp. and Panulirus spp., despite making up only 12% of spawning sites included in the model. In C. strigosus, S. rubroviolaceus, and C. strigosus, Kalaupapa showed a particularly high out-degree, or number of outgoing connections to other regions, and West Kalaupapa was likewise one of the few regions on Moloka‘i that acted as a net larval source across every bit of species (Fig. 8). Their study has likewise demonstrated that different regions of a marine protected locality can potentially achieve different roles, even in a wee MPA such as Kalaupapa. Across species, the east coast of Kalaupapa showed a significantly higher betweenness centrality than the west (p = 0.028), while the west coast of Kalauapapa showed a significantly higher source–sink index than the east (p = 2.63e−9).

Figure 10: Larval spillover from Kalaupapa National Historical Park. Site-level dispersal to sites around Moloka‘i from sites in the Kalaupapa National Historical Park protected area, by species. (A–D) Short dispersers (3–25 days), (E–G) medium dispersers (30–50 days), and (H–J) long dispersers (140–270 days). Edge color reflects symmetry of dispersal along that edge; red indicates higher symmetry while yellow indicates lower proportion. Kalaupapa National Historical Park is highlighted in light green. Discussion Effects of biological and physical parameters on connectivity

We incorporated the distribution of suitable habitat, variable reproduction, variable PLD, and ontogenetic changes in swimming competence and empirical vertical distributions of larvae into their model to multiply biological realism, and assess how such traits repercussion predictions of larval dispersal. The Wong-Ala et al. (2018) IBM provides a highly supple model framework that can easily exist modified to incorporate either additional species-specific data or entirely unusual biological traits. In this study, they included specific spawning seasons for every bit of species, as well as spawning by moon angle for Cellana spp., P. meandrina, and C. ignoblis because such data was available for these species. It proved difficult to obtain the necessary biological information to parameterize the model, but as more data about life history and larval conduct become available, such information can exist easily added for these species and others. Some potential additions to future iterations of the model might comprehend density of reproductive-age adults within each habitat patch, temperature-dependent pelagic larval duration (Houde, 1989), ontogenetic-dependent behavioral changes such as orientation and diel vertical migration (Fiksen et al., 2007; Paris, Chérubin & Cowen, 2007), pre-competency period, and larval habitat preferences as such information becomes available.

In this study, they own demonstrated that patterns of fine-scale connectivity around Moloka‘i are largely species-specific and can vary with life history traits, even in species with identical pelagic larval duration. For example, the parrotfish S. rubroviolaceus and C. perspicillatus demonstrate greater connectivity along the northern coast, while the goatfish P. porphyreus shows higher connectivity along the eastern half of the island. These species own similar PLD windows, but vary in dispersal depth and spawning season. Spawning season and timing altered patterns of inter-island dispersal (Fig. 5) as well as overall settlement success, which was slightly higher in species that spawned by moon angle (Fig. 2). While maximum PLD did appear play a role in the probability of rare long-distance dispersal, minimum PLD appears to exist the main driver of incurious dispersal distance (Fig. 2). Overall, species with a shorter minimum PLD had higher settlement success, shorter exist distinguished dispersal distance, higher local retention, and higher local connectivity as measured by the amount and size of strongly connected components.

The interaction of biological and oceanographic factors likewise influenced connectivity patterns. Because mesoscale current patterns can vary substantially over the course of the year, the timing of spawning for certain species may exist captious for estimating settlement (Wren et al., 2016; Wong-Ala et al., 2018). Intermittent ocean processes may influence the probability of local retention versus long-distance dispersal; a big symmetry of larvae settled to O‘ahu, which is reasonably surprising given that in order to settle from Moloka‘i to O‘ahu, larvae must cross the Kaiwi Channel (approx. 40 km). However, the intermittent presence of mesoscale gyres may act as a stabilizing pathway across the channel, sweeping larvae up either the windward or leeward coast of O‘ahu depending on spawning site. Likewise, in their model long-distance dispersal to Hawai‘i Island was feasible at certain times of the year due to a gyre to the north of Maui; larvae were transported from Kalaupapa to this gyre, where they were carried to the northeast shore of Hawai‘i (Fig. S6). introductory analysis likewise suggests that distribution of larval depth influenced edge directionality and size of connected components (Fig. 7); surface currents are variable and primarily wind-driven, giving positively-buoyant larvae different patterns of dispersal than species that disperse deeper in the water column (Fig. S7).

Model limitations and future perspectives

Our findings own several caveats. Because fine-scale density estimates are not available for their species of interest around Moloka’i, they assumed that fecundity is equivalent at every bit of sites. This simplification may lead us to under- or over-estimate the strength of connections between sites. lack of adequate data likewise necessitated estimation or extrapolation from congener information for larval traits such as larval dispersal depth and PLD. Since it is difficult if not impossible to identify larvae to the species plane without genetic analysis, they used genus-level larval distribution data (Boehlert & Mundy, 1996), or lacking that, an estimate of 50–100 m as a depth layer that is generally more enriched with larvae (Boehlert, Watson & Sun, 1992; Wren & Kobayashi, 2016). They likewise estimated PLD in several cases using congener-level data (see Table 1). While specificity is model for making informed management decisions about a certain species, past sensitivity analysis has shown that variation in PLD length does not greatly repercussion patterns of dispersal in species with a PLD of >40 days (Wren & Kobayashi, 2016).

Although their MITgcm current model shows annual consistency, it only spans two and a half years chosen as neutral status ‘average’ ocean conditions. It does not span any El Niño or La Niña (ENSO) events, which occasions wide-scale sea-surface temperature anomalies and may therefore move patterns of connectivity during these years. El Niño can own a particularly strong repercussion on coral reproduction, since the warm currents associated with these events can lead to severe temperature stress (Glynn & D’Croz, 1990; Wood et al., 2016). While there has been diminutive study to date on the effects of ENSO on fine-scale connectivity, previous travail has demonstrated increased variability during these events. For example, Wood et al. (2016) showed a lessen in eastward Pacific dispersal during El Niño years, but an multiply in westward dispersal, and Treml et al. (2008) showed unique connections in the West Pacific as well as an multiply in connectivity during El Niño. While these effects are difficult to predict, especially at such a wee scale, additional model years would multiply assurance in long-term connectivity estimations. Additionally, with a temporal resolution of 24 h, they could not adequately address the role of tides on dispersal, and therefore did not comprehend them in the MITgcm. Storlazzi et al. (2017) showed that tidal forces did move larval dispersal in Maui Nui, underlining the consequence of including both fine-scale, short-duration models and coarser-scale, long-duration models in final management decisions.

We likewise confine their model’s scope geographically. Their goal was to determine whether they could resolve predictive patterns at this scale apropos to management. Interpretation of connectivity output can exist biased by spatial resolution of the ocean model, since tangled coastal processes can exist smoothed and therefore repercussion larval trajectories. To confine this bias, they focused mainly on coastal and regional connectivity on scales greater than the current resolution. They likewise used the finest-scale current products available for their study area, and their results demonstrate general agreement with similar studies of the region that utilize a coarser resolution (Wren & Kobayashi, 2016) and a finer resolution (Storlazzi et al., 2017). Also, while scholarship of island-scale connectivity is distinguished for local management, it does disregard potential connections from other islands. In their calculations of edge density, betweenness centrality and source-sink index, they included only settlement to Moloka‘i, discarding exogenous sinks that would bias their analysis. Likewise, they cannot prognosticate the symmetry of larvae settling to other islands that originated from Moloka‘i, or the symmetry of larvae on Moloka‘i that originated from other islands.

It is likewise distinguished to note scale in relation to measures of connectivity; they await that long-dispersing species such as Caranx spp. and Panulirus spp. will demonstrate much higher measures of connectivity when measured across the total archipelago as opposed to a sole island. The cut-nodes observed in these species may not actually smash up populations on a big scale due to this inter-island connectivity. Nevertheless, cut-nodes in species with short- and medium-length PLD may indeed imprint distinguished habitat locations, especially in terms of providing links between two otherwise disconnected coasts. It may exist that for certain species or certain regions, stock replenishment relies on larval import from other islands, underscoring the consequence of MPA selection for population maintenance in the archipelago as a whole.

Implications for management

Clearly, there is no sole management approach that encompasses the breadth of life history and conduct differences that repercussion patterns of larval dispersal and connectivity (Toonen et al., 2011; Holstein, Paris & Mumby, 2014). The spatial, temporal, and species-specific variability suggested by their model stresses the necessity for multi-scale management, specifically tailored to local and regional connectivity patterns and the suite of target species. Even on such a wee scale, different regions around the island of Moloka‘i can play very different roles in the greater pattern of connectivity (Fig. 8); sites along the west coast, for example, showed fewer ingoing and outgoing connections than sites on the north coast, and therefore may exist more at risk of isolation. Seasonal variation should likewise exist taken into account, as mesoscale current patterns (and resulting connectivity patterns) vary over the course of a year. Their model suggests species-specific temporal patterns of settlement (Fig. 5); even in the year-round spawner O. cyanea, local retention to Moloka‘i as well as settlement to O‘ahu was maximized in spring and early summer, while settlement to other islands mostly occurred in late summer and fall.

Regions that demonstrate similar network dynamics may benefit from similar management strategies. Areas that act as larval sources either by symmetry of larvae (high source–sink index) or number of sites (high out-degree) should receive management consideration. On Moloka‘i, across every bit of species in their study, these sources fell mostly on the northern and eastern coasts. Maintenance of these areas is especially distinguished for downstream areas that depend on upstream populations for a source of larvae, such as those with a low source–sink index, low in-degree, and/or low local retention. Across species, regions with the highest betweenness centrality scores fell mainly in the northeast (Cape Halawa and Pauwalu Harbor). These areas should receive consideration as potentially distinguished intergenerational pathways, particularly as a means of connecting north-coast and south-coast populations, which showed a lack of connectivity both in total number of connections (edge density) and symmetry of larvae. Both of these connectivity measures were included because edge density includes every bit of connections, even those with a very wee symmetry of larvae, and may therefore comprehend rare dispersal events that are of diminutive relevance to managers. Additionally, edge density comparisons between networks should exist viewed with the caveat that these networks execute not necessarily own the identical number of nodes. Nevertheless, both edge density and symmetry demonstrate very similar patterns, and comprehend both demographically-relevant common connections as well as rare connections that could influence genetic connectivity.

Management that seeks to establish a resilient network of spatially managed areas should likewise consider the preservation of both weakly-connected and strongly-connected components, as removal of key cut-nodes (Fig. S5) breaks up a network. Sites within a SCC own more direct connections and therefore may exist more resilient to local population loss. pervade should exist taken to preserve breeding populations at larval sources, connectivity pathways, and cut-nodes within a SCC, since without these key sites the network can fragment into multiple independent SCCs instead of a sole stable network. This exercise may exist especially distinguished for species for which they estimate multiple wee SCCs, such as Cellana spp. or P. meandrina.

Kalaupapa Peninsula emerged as an distinguished site in Moloka‘i population connectivity, acting as a larval source for other regions around the island. The Park seeded areas along the north shore in every bit of species, and likewise exported larvae to sites along the east and west shores in every bit of species except P. meandrina and Cellana spp. Additionally, it was a larval source for sites along the south shore in the fishes C. perspicillatus, S. rubroviolaceus, and C. strigosus as well as Panulirus spp. Western Kalaupapa Peninsula was one of only three regions included in the analysis (the others being Ki‘oko‘o and Pu‘ukaoku Point, likewise on the north shore) that acted as a net larval source across every bit of species. Eastern Kalaupapa Peninsula was particularly highly connected, and was fragment of a strongly connected component in every species. The Park likewise emerged as a potential point of connection to adjacent islands, particularly to O‘ahu and Hawai‘i. Expanding the spatial scale of their model will further elucidate Kalaupapa’s role in the greater pattern of inter-island connectivity.

In addition to biophysical modeling, genetic analyses can exist used to identify persistent population structure of relevance to managers (Cowen et al., 2000; Casey, Jardim & Martinsohn, 2016). Their finding that exchange among islands is generally low in species with a short- to medium-length PLD agrees with population genetic analyses of marine species in the Hawaiian Islands (Bird et al., 2007; Rivera et al., 2011; Toonen et al., 2011; Concepcion, Baums & Toonen, 2014). On a finer scale, they prognosticate some plane of shoreline-specific population structure for most species included in the study (Fig. 6). Unfortunately, genetic analyses to date own been performed over too broad a scale to effectively compare to these fine-scale connectivity predictions around Moloka‘i or even among locations on adjacent islands. These model results justify such wee scale genetic analyses because there are species, such as the coral P. meandrina, for which the model predicts pellucid separation of north-shore and south-shore populations which should exist simple to test using genetic data. To validate these model predictions with this technique, more fine-scale population genetic analyses are needed.

Conclusions

The maintenance of demographically connected populations is distinguished for conservation. In this study, they contribute to the growing body of travail in biophysical connectivity modeling, focusing on a region and suite of species that are of relevance to resource managers. Furthermore, they demonstrate the value of quantifying fine-scale relationships between habitat sites via graph-theoretic methods. Multispecies network analysis revealed persistent patterns that can embolden define region-wide practices, as well as species-specific connectivity that merits more individual consideration. They demonstrate that connectivity is influenced not only by PLD, but likewise by other life-history traits such as spawning season, moon-phase spawning, and ontogenetic changes in larval depth. high local retention of larvae with a short- or medium-length PLD is consistent with population genetic studies of the area. They likewise identify regions of management importance, including West Kalaupapa Peninsula, which acts as a consistent larval source across species; East Kalaupapa Peninsula, which is a strongly connected region in every species network, and Pauwalu Harbor/Cape Halawa, which may act as distinguished multigenerational pathways. Connectivity is only one piece of the perplex of MPA effectiveness, which must likewise account for reproductive population size, long-term persistence, and post-settlement survival (Burgess et al., 2014). That being said, their study provides a quantitative roadmap of potential demographic connectivity, and thus presents an effective implement for estimating current and future patterns of dispersal around Kalaupapa Peninsula and around Moloka‘i as a whole.

Supplemental Information Current patterns in the model domain.

Current direction and velocity is displayed at a depth of 55 m below sea surface on (A) March 31st, 2011, (B) June 30th, 2011, (C) September 30th, 2011, and (D) December 31st, 2011. Arrowhead direction follows current direction, and u/v velocity is displayed through arrow length and color (purple, low velocity, red, high velocity). Domain extends from 198.2°E to 206°E and from 17°N to 22.2°N. The island of Moloka‘i is highlighted in red.

Subset of validation drifter paths.

Drifter paths in black and corresponding model paths are colored by drifter ID. every bit of drifter information was extracted from the GDP Drifter Data Assembly hub (Elipot et al., 2016). Drifters were included if they fell within the model domain spatially and temporally, and were tested by releasing 1,000 particles on the revise day where they entered the model domain, at the uppermost depth layer of their oceanographic model (0–5 m).

Selected larval depth distributions.

Modeled vertical larval distributions for Caranx spp. (left), S. rubroviolaceus and C. perspicillatus (middle), and P. porphyreus (right), using data from the 1996 NOAA ichthyoplankton vertical distributions data report (Boehlert & Mundy 1996).

Coast-specific rearward settlement patterns by island

Proportion of simulated larvae settled to each island from sites on each coast of Moloka‘i, averaged across every bit of species that successfully settled to that island.

Regional cut-nodes for four species networks

Mokio Point and La‘au Point were cut-nodes for Cellana spp., Mokio Point was a cut-node for C. perspicillatus and S. rubroviolaceus, Pauwalu Harbor and Pala‘au were cut-nodes for C. ignoblis, and Leinaopapio Point was a cut-node for Panulirus spp.

Selected dispersal pathways for Panulirus spp. larvae

500 randomly sampled dispersal pathways for lobster larvae (Panulirus spp.) that successfully settled to Hawai‘i Island after being spawned off the coast of Moloka‘i. Red tracks attest settlement earlier in the year (February–March), while black tracks attest settlement later in the year (April–May). Most larvae are transported to the northeast coast of Hawai‘i via a gyre to the north of Maui, while a smaller symmetry are transported through Maui Nui.

Eddy differences by depth layer.

Differences in eddy pattern and strength in surface layers (A, 2.5 m) vs. profound layers (B, 55 m) on March 31, 2011. Arrowhead direction follows current direction, and u/v velocity is displayed through arrow length and color (purple, low velocity, red, high velocity). While big gyres remain consistent at different depths, smaller features vary along this gradient. For example, the currents around Kaho‘olawe, the wee gyre off the eastern coast of O‘ahu, and currents to the north of Maui every bit of vary in direction and/or velocity.


Fujitsu Begins Education champion System trial in Indonesia | killexams.com existent questions and Pass4sure dumps

System to utilize tablets to contribute to improved academic competence for young adults in Indonesia, which has the largest population in Southeast Asia

TOKYO, Nov 7, 2016 - (JCN Newswire) - Fujitsu Limited and PT. Fujitsu Indonesia today announced that they will hold a trial of an education champion system using tablets at the SMA Negeri 74 Jakarta high school from November7 through December 23.

In this trial, teachers and students will fabricate utilize of the FUJITSU Tablet ARROWS Tab Q704/H tablets in classes, as well as the Fujitsu Education Solution K-12 Learning Information Utilization System V1 Chietama. Using the Chietama solution, teachers can easily prepare materials for lessons using ICT, and can likewise utilize such information as automatically stored lesson records and student learning records to further better students' academic abilities. In addition, because students can share their various answers and creations on the tablet screens, the system improves students' dynamic participation in lessons and their teamwork when working in groups. The companies will validate the effectiveness of this education solution, which has already produced results in Japan and Thailand, through this trial in the front lines of education in Indonesia.

This initiative was launched by Fujitsu Indonesia with the cooperation of the Global Peace Foundation (GPF) Indonesia, which is a non-governmental organization (NGO) aimed at improving the capabilities of students in Indonesia.

Background

Indonesia has the largest population in Southeast Asia at over 250 million people, and about 40% of that population is under the age of 18. In order to better the capabilities and educational standards of these young people, the Jakarta Department of Education and the GPF launched a program called the Character & Creativity Initiative (CCI) at 12 high schools, including SMA Negeri 74, in August of 2015. Under this program, a variety of initiatives own been undertaken, such as travail experience programs, in order to better the students' "character", relating to their initiative, teamwork, and communication ability, and their "creativity," relating to their innovative sensibility and problem solving ability.

Since 2014, Fujitsu has provided the Chietama solution in Japan, and in 2015 began offering it in Thailand. Now, through this first trial of Chietama solution in Indonesia, after demonstrating the effectiveness of education using ICT, Fujitsu will contribute to increasing academic competence in Indonesia, which has about 50 million students from elementary school through high school, and about three million teachers.

Photo: Students taking fragment in the field trial at SMA Negeri 74 Jakarta high schoolhttp://www.acnnewswire.com/topimg/Low_FujitsuIndonesia117.jpg

Trial Summary

1. trial Location

SMA Negeri 74 Jakarta high School (number of students: 737)

2. trial Period

November 7 , 2016 - December 23, 2016

3. System Structure

ARROWS Tab Q704/H enterprise tablets - two for teachers, 18 for students"Chietama solution" learning information utilization system for tablet

4. System Summary

1) Improving lesson experience and achieving collaborative learning

Teachers can easily prepare lessons using ICT by just dragging and dropping the data for the materials they intent to utilize on a schedule in the Chietama solution. In addition, because information on the teaching materials used and video of the writing on the blackboard are automatically stored, and information such as the date and subject being taught are automatically attached, teachers can utilize this lesson record data to anatomize their lessons. Moreover, because teachers can search each student's records from ascend school till graduation, and visualize their growth process, it can likewise exist useful in education customized to the individual student.

In addition, by having bi-directional communication with teachers on the tablet screens, students can not only participate in lessons as though being taught in a one-on-one teaching environment, they can likewise share other students' answers and work, which can lead to education from a more multifaceted viewpoint and improvements in teamwork in group learning.

2) Training for ICT champion staff

Based on the scholarship gained from the Learning Project of Tomorrow(1), Fujitsu likewise carried out training for the school's ICT champion staff. By having the ICT champion staff embolden students and teachers learn how to utilize the system, they are supporting the digitalization of lessons, such that the school can hope to achieve ongoing utilization of ICT going forward.

(1) Learning Project of Tomorrow

A project in which Fujitsu loaned every bit of the devices and software necessary for lessons using ICT to six elementary and middle schools, five in five different regions in Japan and one in the ASEAN region, to champion the progress of schools and learning suited to the 21st century.

About PT. Fujitsu Indonesia

All company or product names mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Information provided in this press release is accurate at time of publication and is subject to change without foster notice.

About Fujitsu Ltd

Fujitsu is the leading Japanese information and communication technology (ICT) company, offering a replete sweep of technology products, solutions, and services. Approximately 159,000 Fujitsu people champion customers in more than 100 countries. They utilize their experience and the power of ICT to shape the future of society with their customers. Fujitsu Limited (TSE:6702; ADR:FJTSY) reported consolidated revenues of 4.7 trillion yen (US$41 billion) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. For more information, please survey http://www.fujitsu.com.

* please survey this press release, with images, at:http://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/resources/news/press-releases/

Source: Fujitsu Ltd

Contact:

Fujitsu Limited Public and Investor Relations Tel: +81-3-3215-5259 URL: www.fujitsu.com/global/news/contacts/

Copyright 2016 JCN Newswire . every bit of rights reserved.



Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [47 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [746 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1530 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [368 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [269 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





References :


Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/p2050-004
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11445791
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-hl
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356951779/Pass4sure-P2050-004-IBM-Commerce-Solutions-Order-Mgmt-Technical-Mastery-Test-v1-exam-braindumps-with-real-questions-and-practice-software
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000GKEQ
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12025404
Youtube : https://youtu.be/Gv_LTLG2oow
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/real-p2050-004-questions-that-appeared.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/ExactlySameP2050-004QuestionsAsInRealTestWtf
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/241758545
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/dont-miss-these-ibm-p2050-004-dumps
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/aCKVKrkh9P7?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/0049235264ee523fabbb0
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/gfhkcqzns76iqwbl50f6m33vjyzarboy
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5ce0zb0a6e08cc1444f15b39eb6c155b5d92b
coursehero.com : "Excle"






Back to Main Page

www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://ajo.se/